Evolving Philosophy of Practice
During my first blog I commented on how unsure I was about my philosophy of practice. I ended the blog with the comforting thought that even though I didn’t know, there would be time for me to figure it out. Since then, I’ve attended a two day conference on blended learning. My attitude going into the conference was one of excitement and challenge. It was my expectation that I would learn quite a bit, some of which I would be able to apply at work and some of which I wouldn’t. After two days of struggling to find meaning and useful information, it occurred to me that regardless of how much you think you know, you can still get it wrong.
My instructor for the conference is a successful business woman. She spoke of concepts and theories about learning that I have just previously learned about formally. She gave ideas and suggestions for taking theory to practice, and showed much enthusiasm and passion about her work. So why do I think she got it wrong? For the most part, the group of attendees at the conference have been involved in training and education programs at their respective companies for quite a while, so even though they may have had no formal education on adult learning theories, they have been practicing those theories in action for quite some time. Even after repeated suggestions to speed the discussions up or to eliminate some topics, because there was no need to discuss; she continued to strictly follow the agenda anyway. Despite my enthusiasm for the subject, it was hard for me to stay awake. When the morning of day two came, we were clearly short a few people from the day before. How could this woman who knows so much about how adults learn and the best ways to meet those needs, get it so wrong?
After this grueling two days I wonder – can I have a concrete philosophy of practice? Can my philosophy of practice be to meet my students wherever they need me to however they need me to in order for them to learn; or I am looking at this all wrong?
Thoughts anyone?